Forgot password

We'll send an emal to you where you can change your password.
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Sports For Nikon F

Price alert

What do you think about Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Sports For Nikon F

0 characters (min 20)

Product reviews

Show product page →
4.4
47 reviews
1
0%
2
0%
3
9%
4
32%
5
34%
Amazon
★★★
★★
7 years ago
My second favorite lens for concert photography

My second favorite lens for concert photography. I use the Sigma Art 50-100 mm lens 1.8 for very dark close venues and this lens works great if I am not able to get so close to the stage. With f2.8 it does well in the dark, changing light environment. Quick and sharp focus

Bestbuy
★★★★★
14 years ago
Excellent for the price

Since I couldn`t afford Nikon version of 70-200mm, I decided to go with Sigma. I did very extensive research and decided it`s worth the money. It`s been over a month, I took maybe thousand pictures with it. I can say this I`m in love with it. It`s a perfect lens for portrait works.

Price; Bokeh; Sharpness

Smooth at 200mm

epinions.com
★★★★★
11 years ago
Great lens

Buy it for the cost, love it for it ability to take great photos.

Lower cost than Canon lens; 4 year warranty ; awesome pictures

High cost

B&H Photo
★★★★
6 years ago
Some picky things...

I buy Nikon lenses. I'm not a lens snob [yes I am] but I want hardware uniformity so that I can't blame the equipment when there's an issue. There's many small things that immediately stand out as negative to me about the Nikon mount version of this sigma lens. 1.

wexphotographic.com
★★★★★
9 years ago
Sharp lens

This is a great value-for-money lens. It feels great in the hand, but more importantly it focuses quickly and is very sharp.

Consistent Output; Easily Interchangeable; Quick Focus; Sharp Focus; Strong Construction

None

Vistek
★★★★★
12 years ago

I purchase this Sigma 70-200mm lens as a replacement for my Canon 70-200mm lens without stabilize capabilities. WOW, what a amazing lens, on my first day of purchasing it I went out to back country National park area,I guess I can call it my lucky lens.

Ebay
★★★★★
11 years ago
Excellent Build, Excellent Image Quality, great alternative to Canon.

I am a professional wedding photographer, and my Canon 70-200 2.8L IS had pretty much run its course, and I was no longer happy with the image quality. I didn't want to spend over $2000 on a replacement, as I am primarily a prime lens shooter and my 135mm produces images just as sharp as the new...

buydig.com
★★★★★
11 years ago
Rugged is better than light and cheap!

Lens is a little heavy, but better that cheap, light weight plastic. Lens is used mostly for shooting indoor concerts & sporting events and seems to fast focus very well.

Consistent Output; Durable; Easily Interchangeable; Fast / accurate auto-focus; Rugged; Strong Construction

Heavy

ebay.com.au
★★★★
10 years ago
A great lens for the intermediate photographer

This is the first time I have used a lens of this size, weight and features. So far I am pleased with the ease of which I can test each of the auto, manual focus and stabalizer features. For my style of photography I am pleased with the image clarity and colour.

Amazon
★★★★★
7 years ago
One of my favourites

Absolutely love this one. I am not a professional photographer but I am not a total novice either (my first SLR was a nikon F8001 - so well over 25 years ago). I do own a few other f/2.8 zoom lenses (sigma included - two versions of the 24-70 (with the older one being much better btw) and this is by...

|< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >|

Price alert