When people ask for recommendations on a super-wide-angle lens, they're often trying to decide between the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and the Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5. I tested these two lenses side by side last year and decided on the Sigma 10-20mm for several reasons: 1. Extra range 2.

BIG FAT YES! Good lens, Good value for money, Very nice quality pictures. Nothing to complain about. Who not happy just buy better, pay 700,1000,1500 pound and more for lenses. If money is a problem so just enjoy what you got. 100% RECOMEND this lens.

The build quality of the lens is excellent. It features the crinkle style finish typical for Sigma EX lenses, both zoom and focus ring are damped, the latter a little stiff, though.

Got this lens for a fairly good deal compared to the going rate, was delivered quickly and safely. For landscape photography its one of the best lens for the money. Of course its great to spread the cost with an account.

f3.5 aperture throughout the entire zoom range and is perfect for low light photography. Sigma wide angle lenses accentuate the relationship of subjects within a photo and thus become an important creative tool.

I also bought the Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR to compare, which runs roughly $100 cheaper. These are both ultra wides. For the money, I found the Sigma superior in quality w/ metal connectors, sturdy body, quality glass and less plastic overall.

Great wide angle lens

None

nice build quality . quite less distortion . but the gocus ring is little hard to turn .

The lens produces quality results, and the build quality is strong. Would recommend for landscape photography, or even capturing Dubai's skyline.

Build quality; Sharpness; Focal length range

Edge distortion

This is a great quality performing lens. I have had the Sigma 10-20mm 3.5 for 5 years and I cannot fault it.