I have only used it for three weeks in the Northwest where the sun rarely comes out, so slow shutter and higher ISO was required. Hand held the IS really worked well. I also have a 35mm f1.4 that I use with my X-E2, so comparing edge sharpness should have been distingtly better with the 35mm, but it...

Consistent Output; Easily Interchangeable; Fast / accurate auto-focus; Lightweight; Nice Bokeh

The Fujifilm XC 50-230mm F4.5-6.7 OIS is a natural partner for the XC 16-50mm lens, offering good telephoto performance whilst being relatively small and light. The Fujifilm XC 50-230mm F4.5-6.7 OIS is pleasingly sharp in the image centre at 50mm and 100mm, with performance starting to drop off from...

I was looking for a camera to complement my Nikon d7100s quality but in a small form factor . The fuji system is the answer to that sentence. All the newer fuji cameras have better high iso image quality then the 7100, this is not a lie, this is for real.

The Fujinon XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6-7 OIS is a good performer in relation to its price level. The results are mostly sharp in the image center. The corners aren't quite as snappy in the upper range but let's be fair - you don't tend to place the main subject of your scene into the extreme corners...

I bought this lens for a trip to Cornwall in March 2014. My prize image was of the first robin of spring. In fact, that was a lifer, since the American robin is an entirely different bird. The lens pairs nicely with the X-A1.

light weight; sharp wide open; OIS very effective

none

I want to use this lens to take photo of birds in my garden but birds always move quickly before the focus of this lens work. So I have to ask for birds to move slowly.

Manual lens works great. Already took some amazing pictures with it. Good value for the price.

Very pleased with my lens, exactly as expected. It arrived in good time and I was kept up to date at every stage.

Good lens. Serves my purpose

Used this yesterday to try and take shots of a parade, it failed miserably, the auto focus just wasn't up to the job, most shots came out blurred. I've nothing but praise for it though if you're photographing static objects, does the job well then.